The "Matrix" Created by Controlled Conflict

Posted: January 21st, 2007 by Militant Libertarian

by Henry Makow, PhD (

Recently a feud between Donald Trump and Rosie O’Donnell gave their ratings
a boost. Mel Gibson and Michael Richards also made gratuitous attacks that
helped their bottom line.

What if the world’s great conflicts were just as phony? What if Bush and
Chavez; Blair and Putin; Olmert and Ahmadinejad were all part of a giant
Punch and Judy Show?

What if we were riding the roller coaster, cheering and groaning, and biting
our finger nails for nothing? What if it were all staged like professional
wrestling (only thousands of innocent people were dying?)

Many of us consider Ahmadinejad, Putin and Chavez the “good guys” in the
fight against the New World Order. It’s possible they are controlled by the
Illuminati as well. Our hidden masters control everything else. Would they
leave war to chance?

I can’t prove this grand hypothesis today. However, there is some anecdotal

First, take past wars. None of them were anything like inevitable. I have
shown how World War One was made possible by British food subsidies to the
Germans, and ended when this trade stopped. World War Two, which Churchill
called the most “unnecessary war in history” was also engineered through
loans to the Nazis and the policy of “Appeasement.” The Masonic bankers
also engineered US entry into WW II.

The war supposedly was fought for the independence of Poland yet at the end,
Eastern Europe was under the heel of the Russians, the 1939-1941 allies of
the Nazis. Instead of Nazis, Polish nationalists were massacred by Soviets.
An improvement? Sounds to me like war for its own sake, or for Communism.

Our War on Terror is the natural successor of the “Cold War”; both as phony
as three-dollar bills. The war on Iraq? Lebanon? Afghanistan? Iran? Do any
of them make any sense? These wars are unwinnable. How do you win a guerilla
war without annihilating everyone? They are not meant to be won.

As Dick Cheney intimated, the Iraq War will last 40 years i.e. as long as
the Cold War. Both sides are subsidized and controlled by the world’s
central bankers and their secret societies/intelligence agencies.

War is an end in itself. It concentrates money and power in the hands of our
Satan-loving elites. It provides human sacrifices to their bloodthirsty god
and brutalizes and demoralizes humanity.

It is a waste of energy to discuss the “political reasons” for these
conflicts. They are a ruse.

OUR “MISLEADERS” ( term coined by Jordan Maxwell)
After debating for months whether the US was winning or losing in Iraq,
someone decided it was losing. As the “decider,” Bush stoutly accepted
responsibility and even shed a tear at a soldier’s funeral.

That didn’t prevent the demonizing of poor George. His opponents assailed
his sanity, intelligence, virility and honor. What do they expect of an
admitted satanist?

George is not to blame. Every President in the Twentieth Century has been a
hand puppet of the Rothschild-Rockefeller cartel of cartels. They wouldn’t
let George manage a gas station let alone the “Free World.” Luckily, Bush
just reads the teleprompter.

Derision only gives him credibility heightening the illusion that the US has
a functioning democracy, mass media and justice system. Remember, the US
government is ultimately responsible for the slaughter of 3000 Americans in
broad daylight Sept. 11. The US ruling class and punditry are complicit in
the ongoing cover-up. The most obvious “controlled conflict” is the two
party system.

Let’s look at the “opponents” of globalization and the New World Order.
Chavez, Putin and Ahmadinejad were all obscure figures handed power by a
hidden hand. Like Bush, they certainly lack the stature of real “deciders.”

Chavez and Ahmadinejad vilify Bush and the USA, but, like Chavez’ mentor
Noam Chomsky, cannot pronounce the words “Rothschild” or “central banker.”

Chavez’s Bolivarian Revolution is Freemasonic in origin, as is his
Communism. Someone claims he met Chavez at a meeting of the Grand Lodge of
Texas in the 1990’s. Chaevez led a failed coup but got out of jail after
only 2 years. Wikipedia reports that he later received campaign funds from
large banks.

Now Chavez and Ahmadinejad are busy establishing an Anti-American coalition
in South America: More controlled conflict.

I suspect that the bankers set up Nationalist and anti-Globalist spokesmen
and groups in order to control both sides. The tip off is if these people
are getting corporate/government support and coverage in the mass media.
Canadian examples are Naomi Klein, Maude Barlow and Mel Hurtig.

On the other hand, you know Connie Fogal, leader of the Canadian Action
Party is legit because she talks about the bankers and consequently gets no
media. In the US, Aaron Russo is legit for the same reason.

It’s apparent that political action requires money. The bankers mint it. The
rest of us are too busy making a living to be anything but bystanders and

These days you can’t turn on the media without someone (usually Zionists
like Charles Adler or Glenn Beck,) stirring up hostility against Iran and
Muslims in general. They keep talking about how war-like Islam is when we
are invading them! Any future conflict may destroy Israel, but these highly
paid shills don’t care. War for its own sake is the goal.

War is considered “revolutionary” because it advances the Masonic bankers’
goal of the New World Order. It “overturns” the natural and divinely
intended development of mankind.

To have a war, the bankers need to create and provision two sides. Thus all
wars are waged against humanity by a small satanic criminal network that
owns 50% of the world’s wealth. The mainspring is the world’s private
central bankers.

The Hindus have a term for the “Matrix.” They say our lives are governed by
“Maya” or “illusion.”

We didn’t guess anyone would go to so much trouble to create it. Perhaps
liberation lies in recognizing that conflicts are artificially created and

Got comments? Email me, dammit!
Permanent link for this article which can be used on any website:


Leave a Reply