Comments on: How “The Trick” was pulled off http://militantlibertarian.org/2009/11/29/how-the-trick-was-pulled-off/ Give me liberty or eat lead! Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:19:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ATHiker http://militantlibertarian.org/2009/11/29/how-the-trick-was-pulled-off/comment-page-1/#comment-71 ATHiker Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:11:36 +0000 http://militantlibertarian.org/?p=2378#comment-71 From the IPPC 2001 page 131 CH-2 ..Non-climatic growth trends must be removed from the tree-ring chronology, making it difficult to resolve time-scales longer than the lengths of the constituent chronologies (Briffa, 2000)…. The confusion you have is with the word deletion and removed. Did the IPPC 2001 know of the divergence? Yes Any mention of deletion? Yes (Non-climatic growth trends must be removed from the tree-ring chronology) Now is “Non-climatic growth trends must be ‘delete’ from the tree-ring chronology “The same as “Non-climatic growth trends must be removed from the tree-ring chronology”? Yes So in the real world Gavin is correct!!! From the IPPC 2001 page 131 CH-2
..Non-climatic growth trends must be removed from the tree-ring chronology, making it difficult to resolve time-scales longer than the lengths of the constituent chronologies (Briffa, 2000)….

The confusion you have is with the word deletion and removed.

Did the IPPC 2001 know of the divergence? Yes
Any mention of deletion? Yes (Non-climatic growth trends must be removed from the tree-ring chronology)
Now is “Non-climatic growth trends must be ‘delete’ from the tree-ring chronology “The same as “Non-climatic growth trends must be removed from the tree-ring chronology”? Yes

So in the real world Gavin is correct!!!

]]>