<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama, Secessionist Movements and the Nobel Prize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://militantlibertarian.org/2009/12/12/obama-secessionist-movements-and-the-nobel-prize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://militantlibertarian.org/2009/12/12/obama-secessionist-movements-and-the-nobel-prize/</link>
	<description>Give me liberty or eat lead!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:21:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Militant Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://militantlibertarian.org/2009/12/12/obama-secessionist-movements-and-the-nobel-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Militant Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militantlibertarian.org/?p=2737#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Why not broaden that brush you&#039;re attempting to paint us as racists with and throw in some Jewish references too?  Or did you think that might be too much?

If George W Bush was still in office, had won a Nobel Peace Prize, made a speech about war during his acceptance of that peace prize, and was busy tearing down our country (actually, he did that, so I guess there&#039;s no comparison), then yes, this sentiment would still exist.

And you would still be a racist and a bigot, as you have demonstrated yourself to be already.  If Obama were a white man, you would not have made your statement.  But since he&#039;s black and you&#039;re racist, you did.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not broaden that brush you&#8217;re attempting to paint us as racists with and throw in some Jewish references too?  Or did you think that might be too much?</p>
<p>If George W Bush was still in office, had won a Nobel Peace Prize, made a speech about war during his acceptance of that peace prize, and was busy tearing down our country (actually, he did that, so I guess there&#8217;s no comparison), then yes, this sentiment would still exist.</p>
<p>And you would still be a racist and a bigot, as you have demonstrated yourself to be already.  If Obama were a white man, you would not have made your statement.  But since he&#8217;s black and you&#8217;re racist, you did.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://militantlibertarian.org/2009/12/12/obama-secessionist-movements-and-the-nobel-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militantlibertarian.org/?p=2737#comment-76</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Reddit by aliengoods1: I wonder if Republicans, er, Libertarians will still feel the same way then there is a white Republican in office....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Reddit by aliengoods1: I wonder if Republicans, er, Libertarians will still feel the same way then there is a white Republican in office&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jd</title>
		<link>http://militantlibertarian.org/2009/12/12/obama-secessionist-movements-and-the-nobel-prize/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Jd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militantlibertarian.org/?p=2737#comment-75</guid>
		<description>so article II section 2 clause 1 of the constitution

The president...shall be the commander in chief of the united states armed forces and navy of the united states, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the united states.


This puts the president directly in charge of those charged with defending the nation making him in charge of defending the nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so article II section 2 clause 1 of the constitution</p>
<p>The president&#8230;shall be the commander in chief of the united states armed forces and navy of the united states, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the united states.</p>
<p>This puts the president directly in charge of those charged with defending the nation making him in charge of defending the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
