How much should a person have to encounter, or notice, government as they live their life? As long as a person is not attacking- defrauding- or stealing from- the innocent, government should have zero presence in their life whatsoever, unless they choose to contact the government on their own. (And in that case, I suggest counseling.)
That means: no permits, no taxes, no forms to fill out in triplicate, no second glances at the speedometer, no thought as to whether the gun on your hip is visible. No nothing. No contactwhatsoever as long as no innocent person (who is completely unable to defend themselves, and has no one near to help defend them) is being attacked or defrauded. Even in that case they would do well to keep in mind that there is no situation so dire, so hopeless, that it can’t be made orders ofmagnitude worse by having a LEO show up. Invited or not. If you are in real trouble, hope for help to show up without a badge.
I advocate nothing other than reduction or elimination of government in all areas, and growth or lateral shifting of government in none. A lot of what “political freedom advocates” consider “working for freedom” is only lateral movement; shifting the burden slightly to one side without actually addressing the foundational problems. The foundational problem is the act of trying to regulate or control anythingother than aggression or theft (by whatever means, including “taxation“).
When you have the choice, involve government in no area of your life. You will be safer and freer for it.