Getting into the Mind of the Jackboot

Posted: April 24th, 2011 by Militant Libertarian

by Larken Rose, CopBlock

While it’s both easy and useful to point to police abuse and condemn it, often people give little thought to WHY it happens. It’s easy enough–and often accurate–to simply say, “That cop is a power-happy thug,” and leave it at that. But in reality, there is a lot more to it. To better understand how to stop it, we must better understand why it happens. And to better understand that, we must try to get into the mind of the jackboot, to see the world as he sees it. Let us observe the creature in action, and see if we can get inside its head.

There are many thousands of examples of police abuse I could use, but in this, my first article for CopBlock.org, I will start with something relatively benign. Every so often the local police set up a “sobriety checkpoint” on the main road in front of my house. They set up giant floodlights, and have police cars and traffic cones all over the place, and stop everyone coming through (sometimes in both directions, sometimes just in one direction). They ask the driver if he’s been drinking, maybe ask a few other things, shine a flashlight around the inside of the car a bit, and then usually let the guy go. And they do this for hours on end, late into the night.

Larken Rose 001 Getting into the Mind of the Jackboot Larken Rose author, “Most Dangerous Superstition”

 

Let’s consider just that as our example for now. My first question is, Would YOU do that? Would YOU have the gall to stop everyone driving down a street, to ask them if they’re behaving properly? I highly doubt it. So what makes the cops imagine that that’s a legitimate and noble thing to do, instead of recognizing it as being extremely obnoxious (not to mention unconstitutional)? In short, modern “law enforcers” view the world in a fundamentally different way than everyone else, and even different than most “law enforcers” viewed the world a few decades ago.(Once upon a time they were called “officers of the peace,” instead of “law enforcers.”)

While I don’t want this article to turn into an in-depth treatise on Constitutional law (Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, etc.), it is worth pointing out the general mindset expressed in the Bill of Rights. In short, the idea was that, unless the agents of “government” already had “probable cause” to think you had done something nasty, they were supposed to leave you alone. They weren’t supposed to question someone, or search through their stuff, unless they already had reason to suspect someone of a crime. (And back then, a “crime” almost alway meant injuring someone else, not just disobeying any one of the myriad of stupid, arbitrary rules the politicians keep spewing out.)

As it happens, the attitude expressed in the Bill of Rights more or less coincides with the rules for being a decent human being. For example, if you, as a mere civilian, saw someone trying to pry open a window of your neighbor’s house, I bet you’d feel justified confronting him, and asking him what he was doing. On the other hand, you wouldn’t stop everyone on the street to interrogate them, to see if they had done, or were planning on doing, anything you don’t approve of.

What would have to happen for you to think that it was okay for you to randomly stop, interrogate and search people at random (as is now commonly done at airports, “sobriety checkpoints,” “border checkpoints,” and so on)? In short, you would have to stop viewing others as your fellow human beings, and start viewing them as your rightful subjects, and viewing yourself as their rightful master. After all, a slave owner doesn’t hesitate to interrogate, search, or otherwise accost his slaves–which he views as his personal property.

That is why modern “law enforcers” act as they do. They do not view themselves as mere humans whose job it is to protect and serve other humans. They view themselves as the agents of the master (“government”), and they view you, and everyone else, as the property of the master. That is why they imagine themselves to have the right to stop you, detain you, interrogate you, search you, and pretty much do whatever they want to you, and if you ever resist, or even show “attitude,” they believe they have the right to taser you, assault you, and cage you, maybe even kill you. After all, they work for the masters, and you are the slaves. And as long as they view the world that way, you can expect them to keep behaving that way.

In upcoming articles, we will be looking at various examples of tyranny, not just so we can get righteously indignant about them (though we can do that, too), but so we can better understand how it is that the perpetrators of injustice can imagine such actions to be noble and legitimate. Remember, cops all start out as mere human beings. Maybe we can help a few of them to revert back to being human.

Share

Comments (2)

 

  1. Dearest Brother In Liberty Larken,

    Wonderfully Said!

    We would also like to add that MANY enforcers are former military-industrial complex mercenaries. They have been indoctrinated and trained to view human-beings a specific way. Us and them. The good guys and the bad guys. The civilized and the barbarians. The christians and the heathens. The catholics and the protestants. The english and the irish. Sexists. Racists. Religionists. Nationalists. Etc.

    You WILL find one of these traits present, if you are allowed to dig deep enough.

    These enforcers have decided in their own minds that they are willing to murder others in their quests and crusades. Those who are veterans of the mercenaries have, in all probability, directly and or indirectly participated in the invasions, occupations, looting, pillaging, kidnapping, raping, hostage-holding, and murders of Sovereign Human-Beings in Sovereign Foreign Lands.

    One wonders how the hordes of looters and bureaucrats and enforcers and mercenaries can sleep even a wink knowing those around them might actually find their actions intolerable and slit their throat or set their beds on fire.

    Of course, they can always stop their atrocities, repent, and ask for forgiveness.

    Brother In Liberty and Dearest Friend Brad Jardis is just one such example. Brad is available to each and every bureaucrat, enforcer, and mercenary who needs some assistance with unlacing their jackboots.

    Grab yourself copies of Ron Paul’s book Liberty Defined, Ayn Rand’s book Atlas Shrugged, and Tom Baugh’s book Starving The Monkeys.

    Suddenly you will find yourself as a Student and Advocate of the Philosophically Mature Non-Aggression Principle with a much better understanding of Basic Human Rights which include, but are not limited to, Life, Liberty, and Property.

    Starving The Monkeys and Ending The Looterfest,
    John and Dagny Galt
    Atlas Shrugged, Owners Manual For The Universe.(tm)

    .

  2. http://arcticpatriot.blogspot.com/2011/04/moral-high-ground-win.html

    “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
    — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Leave a Reply