I believe once they are turned back at the bridge (if not worse) if the group were to follow my suggestion then this march would still take place and it would be that “shot across the bow” of the tyrannical government that we are trying to state. It would be We the People putting our foot down, drawing the line in the sand and putting this criminal government on notice that if we must come back…then we’ll come 1-3 million strong and we will not disarm at the border of the unfriendly to the American dream land of Washington DC.

At the very least this suggestion, imho should be perhaps a contingency plan.

Again…times have changed since the 1700-2000′s…and the world we have today is FAR different with the ability to disseminate information so quickly. Seriously…the amount of people aware of what the NWO is doing has jumped dramatically since the advent of the internet.

Hillary herself (one of the “elite”) said it herself that “they” are losing the information war. As this awakening wave continues we will eventually reach a point where we will wash these brilliant psychopaths off the stage they have been on for so long now.

We must end the secrecy and the “play ball with us or we will destroy you” kind of world we live in. Seriously…anyone who thinks Obummer is the mastermind behind what’s been going on has GOT to do some personal research.

So I respectfully disagree and hope that if this planned march goes down then the softer side of the variables play out. I still have belief that we can end this thing w/out having to do an armed revolt…that we can use our judicial system to prevent bloodshed. First we must clean that system of the “agents” who have been placed there by the secret societies who run so much from behind the scenes.

We must End the non-Federal Reserve that’s privately owned by the…you guessed it…the SAME people! We MUST take back our money supply (they key on how they have so much control over us) & stop paying the interest (with the hidden inflation) that’s been sucking the very blood, sweat, tears and hopes of the American People! We have the RIGHT to coin our own money! WTF…people! Take that key back!

God Bless.

Your idea is nice and safe, but removes the point. The point being that LAWFULLY ARMED CITIZENS are NOT ALLOWED in the capital of the “FREEST NATION ON EARTH.” This, of course, assuming that the march takes place at all or even needs to take place.

Everyone who participates should be fully cognizant of what they risk by doing so. If they are fully appraised (which, at this point, they should be), they are free to participate or not at their own discretion. That’s what liberty and voluntaryism are all about. If they do accept the possible (even probable) consequences, it’s to their credit that they’re willing to risk all of that in order to make this important point.

The men of Lexington were breaking the law when they stood up to the British, began to back away, and then were forced into a firefight (according to one version of events). The men of Concord were also acting of their own free will, breaking the law, when they attacked the Redcoats. Samuel Adams and John Hancock, the only two founders whom the British ever issued arrest warrants for, were breaking the law when they snuck out and escaped from the soldiers. The Tea Party Patriots were breaking the law when they threw the East India Tea into the harbor.

Our nation was founded on people breaking laws – usually tax and gun confiscation – deliberately. The first major insurrection, though quelled, was a bunch of whiskey runners breaking tax laws. There’s a reason why “the bad guy” in American films is so often actually the good guy. We virtually invented the idea of the outlaw being in the right.

http://militantlibertarian.org/2013/05/18/fudc-adam-kokesh-interview/

It’s a great interview and well worth the listen.

We are in desperate need of a “Firebrand” for the Constitution, someone who’s willing to step up and take the risk of forcing them to make the first move. And by doing so, proving everything… that we are already a police state.

After Boston, that should be undisputable to any rationally thinking person.

https://www.facebook.com/events/252728144871259/?fref=ts

http://youtu.be/E5lhkNUtkBA

There’s no right or wrong way to be an activist. It’s all subjective. Just do something.

In all “movements” (woman’s rights, civil rights, LGBT equality, marijuana legalization, Tea Party, Occupy) there’s always debates about what to do, when to do it, and how people should carry themselves.

As a gay activist, I learned I could never make everyone happy so I stopped trying. For some I was too aggressive. To others I was not aggressive enough. And with the failure of the No on 8 campaign in CA, I saw how getting too preoccupied with “focus group testing” made people lose sight of common sense and good ol’ fashioned bravery.

“Movement” infighting will always happen. It even happens in everyday groups like churches, kids sports teams, and other types of groups too. And this will always scare away the most timid – after all, human nature is to avoid confrontation. Fearful people are usually more contagious than brave people. But we know that we never need a majority. We just need a pissed-off-enough minority.

Just trust your instinct and do what you think is best. And remember, you won’t make everyone happy. Likewise, you can’t over-worry or try to control what others do too.